Friday, 10 July 2009

Slowing Ageing

A truly staggering story from the BBC concerning the effects of restricted diets on the ageing process:
  • Cutting calories may delay the ageing process and reduce the risk of disease, a long-term study of monkeys suggests.
Ok, so the story itself will not be new to the paleo crowd, but what is impressive is the sequence of photographs accompanying the story. What is staggering is the visible difference between the two monkeys. The benefits didn't end there,
  • [by] reducing calorie intake by 30% while maintaining nutrition ...appeared to impact upon many forms of age-related disease seen in monkeys, including cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and brain atrophy.

Personally I have no wish to measure my calorie intake nor reduce it by 30%. But with a combination of intermittent fasting/episodic feasting and fasting, along with eating within 'feeding windows', there is evidence that you can enjoy all of the benefits without the mathematics and will power.

It should come as no surprise that the British Dietetic Association pop up to offer some vacuous knee jerk reaction to the story. Although the BDA warn that "monkeys may be a close relation but there are significant differences which means not everything we see in them can be translated to humans" they go on to scare and speculate and trash their own weight loss ideology thus:

  • there should be some serious reservations about cutting calories so dramatically, particularly for anyone under the age of 30....People would have to weigh up whether they are prepared to compromise their enjoyment of food for the uncertain promise of a longer life, and a life which could be dogged by all sorts of problems - including osteoporosis."

Now then, somebody remind me how the BDA and their ilk recommend we lose fat...eat less (calorie restriction) and do more! Baise moi.

Thursday, 9 July 2009

Istvan Javorek's Conditioning Program

Istvan Javorek seems to be getting a higher profile in the fitness world. A recent article on MSN highlighted his approach which involves:
  • [compressing] a high volume of intense work by shrinking or even eliminating rest periods, the complexes were originally devised to combat monotony and save time while improving endurance, muscle tone, coordination, and aesthetics.
High intensity workouts that are completed in under 30 minutes? This will be nothing new to the paleo crowd, nor will his ideas that "Overtraining comes from bad technique, bad diet, not enough sleep..if you eliminate these things, it's difficult for overtraining to be the real issue".

The MSN interview goes on to say that, "[his] full-body approach is mirrored in today's functional-training movement" and that "training while sore offers recuperative benefits, as long as the workout is 10 to 20 percent less intense than the one that made you sore".

There is obviously a big overlap with paleo workouts here, and the idea of 'training while sore' is close to the paleo mantra to 'self-locomote daily' and exert oneself according to a power law and invoke play.

While I am not that much of a fan of dumbell and barbell exercises (nor machines for that matter), they perform a service in that they offer a source of resistance. Used in 'complexes' you can get a demanding workout and looking at some of the example footage on you tube (here), this particular program is not dissimilar to my own iron-routines - although, unlike in this example, I reckon you gain more by (quickly) selecting a more appropriate weight for each particular exercise.

The MSN interview gives a good breakdown of Javorek's program thus:

The Drill
Three times a week, do either complex. For Complex Number 1, do 6 reps of each exercise and move to the next without stopping. For Number 2, do three reps of each exercise and move to the next without stopping, building up to 3 total circuits. As you advance, increase the number of circuits.

The Program
1. Upright row: Stand with your knees slightly bent and hold a pair of dumbbells at arms' length in front of your thighs, thumbs facing each other and palms facing your thighs. This stance turns your elbows slightly outward and your shoulders slightly inward. Look ahead with your chest up, back straight, and abs tight. Bring the weights up to neck level, keeping the pair aligned. Your elbows should be flared out to ear level. At the top, rise up on your toes. Return to the starting position.

2. High pull snatch: Stand with dumbbells as if you're about to perform an upright row, but lean forward to lower the weights to knee level, keeping your head and neck aligned. This is the starting position. Now raise the weights as you did with the upright row, but don't pause at the top; instead, flip your wrists back to bring the weights overhead, extending your arms fully while rising up on your toes. Return to the starting position. Keep the weights as close to your body as possible throughout the lift.

3. Squat push press: Stand upright and hold dumbbells at your shoulders, palms facing forward. Maintaining this position and looking straight ahead, bend your hips and knees to lower into a full squat, thighs at least parallel to the floor. As you rise from the squat, begin pressing the weights overhead, rising up on your toes at the top, at which point your arms should be fully extended overhead. Return to the starting position.

4. Bent-over row: Stand holding dumbbells at arm's length in front of you, palms facing back. Bend your knees slightly, and bend at the waist so that your back is flat and angled 45 degrees to the floor. Once your body weight is centered on your heels, you're in the starting position. Without altering this position—no swinging your trunk—bend your elbows to bring the weights quickly and explosively into your armpits. Return to the starting position at a slower pace.

5. High pull snatch: Repeat Number 2.

It is PALEO, but via the backdoor!

Monday, 6 July 2009

Climbing Workout

This evening the weather broke big time with a storm of tropical intensity. I had 30 minutes to spare so figured I'd head to the garage to torch my climbing muscles!

Four cycles through the following, with a set of deadhangs to finish.

Warm Up (5 mins)
Main (15 mins)
1a) Laddering ('for time')
1b) Splits (60s, 60s, 60s)
1c) Alternate One Move L-Sit Rope Climb to Lock-Off and Lower

2a) Deadhang (7s TUL:3s Rest)

Friday, 3 July 2009

Heresy

As Aldous Huxley said:
  • "All great truths begin with heresy"
There's nothing like challenging 'conventional wisdom'! Seemingly it takes a lot to follow the science rather than convention. This paper tackles the thorny issue of not rocking the boat, maintaining the status quo and "making data confess":
  • ''Based on theoretical reasoning it has been suggested that the reliability of findings published in the scientific literature decreases with the popularity of a research field."

Seeing guys like Gary Taubes going in to medical establishments and tackling them on their own turf, in their specialist areas of medicine/biology, you really get to understand what a bold move this is in light of the paper above.

Lactic Sets

Today I repeated the workout with tag '3'. The goal was session was 3 sets of 12 reps with about 2 minutes rest between an exercise.

Warm Up (5 mins)
Main (20 mins)
1a) Rowing (1x120s - Medium Resistance, 29rpm)

2a) Assisted Pistols (3x12 - with '8')
2b) Frog Planche (2x30s)

3a) Wall Assisted Handstands (3x30s)
3b) Kneel Backs (3x30s)

4a) 30s Chin Up (3x1)
4b) Tuck Lever (2x30s)

The 30s chin was a new addition. 15s up and 15s down. I found in hurt my forearms more than anything. This along with the pistols, left me pretty sore coming out of the gym. I had figured on it being an easier day!

Thursday, 2 July 2009

Murray's Press Ups

Watching some of the coverage of Wimbledon you can't fail to have noticed Andy Murray's training. One of his exercises in particular seems to have caught wider attention; the 'Donkey Press-Up'.

It is good to see such novel bodyweight exercises getting wider exposure but I think that Murray might well get bigger bang for his buck with two other variations on this movement.

The first is the plyometric push up. This is best done with blocks/platforms for the hands onto which you can bounce on and off. As this relies on the fundamental press-up movement, you can focus on the shoulders and simple core alignment throughout.

My second recommendation would be the planche. There are many variations of the planche all of which will, if performed properly, reach deep in to your reserves in a matter of seconds, or, if trained, longer (depending on what you want from the session).

Both of these variations require control - and it is easier to execute this control than the donkey push up with the 'wild' precursor to the movement proper. One of the main drawbacks of the DPU is the difficulty in kicking the legs upwards whilst maintaining form.

Variety is what it is about. Donkey push ups are just another tool to do the job. But the static demands of planching and the dynamic demands of the plyometric push up may well be a source of greater gains due to their inherent focus on those muscles intended as the target of the exercise.

Still, it looks like DPUs have got Murray this far so who am I to criticise? Let's hope he can continue his storming form!

Go Andy!

Tuesday, 30 June 2009

The Greatest & Best Diet in the World (Tribute)

Britain's ITV station has been running a two part 'Tonight' special titled "The World's Best Diet". the goal of the diets was to:
  • "...see which one generated the greatest benefit to health based on common markers of good health, such as cholesterol levels, liver function tests, and body mass index"
The diets were followed be several fat 'celebrities' and can broadly be categorised thus:
  1. Japanese (lots of sushi and vegetables)
  2. British (traditional 1950's meat & two veg)
  3. Mediterranean (Italian pasta, heavy on fish and vegetables)
  4. Indian (vegetarian curries made from rice and vegetables)
  5. US (low-carb - meat and vegetables)

You will notice all of them are heavy on the vegetables/plant bits. You will notice that a few of them are heavy on the meat. You will also notice that although two of them feature rice and one of them features pasta, they are all light, in general, on sugar, bread, cereals, pastries, fizzy drinks and other processed foods.

Winner Doesn't Take it All

So which diet won? Which one led to the greatest weight loss. Well the diet that did least well was the Indian, vegetarian diet. The 'shleb following that diet lost 2lbs in six weeks. Ha, ha, ha! the diet that was most effective in terms of weight loss was the US, Low-Carb diet!

....only it didn't win. The 'blurb' on the link above states,

  • "Overall, the Mediterranean-STYLE of eating came out best – not only for correcting cholesterol, boosting vitamin D and improving cholesterol profile, but also for helping Darren lose a phenomenal amount of weight, keeping fit in the process. "

In reality the person following the LC diet (Caroline Malone), lost MOST weight - only a bit more, but more nevertheless. The big downside for the LC diet was the fact that Malone's LDL had risen. Some (obese) dietician from the British Nutrition Foundation (BNF) opined that her LDL had gone up.

Ooooo scary! Yep, having been told for years that "CHOLESTEROL IS BAD", we are now getting the subtler message that "HDL IS GOOD, LDL IS BAD". Give it a few more years and 'they' will cotton on to the fact that LDL is comprised of two subtypes, one of which is harmful and the other beneficial. Guess which subtype an LC diet raises?

Furthermore we do not know whether Malone's LDL was measure directly (I suspect not), or inferred from the limited Friedwald equation. Both Stephan and Mike Eades have superb posts on this very topic.

But that is not all. "Fatty" from the BNF went on to tell us that the LC is not sustainable...because erm, well it just isn't. In fact her argument as to why the LC diet is NOT sustainable can be summarised thus:

  • ""

Hang on a minute, let me bold that for you so you can see the crux of her argument:

  • ""

Erm...hang on a minute, let me number the main points for you...

Erm...errrr......

You see, just as the religious have recourse to the Courtiers Reply under which they shelter from the rationalism and logic of atheism, nutritionists and dietitians have their equivalent. LC is the elephant in the room.

The BNF keep repeating negative speculation about LC that is damaging and misleading. I am sure Fatty mentioned a 'lack of energy' from a LC diet (odd that I and other have found intermittent fasting was made possible by an LC diet), and it was most definitely mentioned that LC was 'not sustainable in the long term' because erm, err, erm.... er - no reason!

I am sick of these (frequently obese) 'advisors' appearing in the media to repeat their rather dated ideas about nutrition. If the BNF or British Dietetics Association's advice was any good, few of their advisors would be fat. I would love to see the weight of their staff plotted over time! They didn't follow the science, they pushed their own agenda. Mediterranean diet my arse. Give me some fatty animal flesh and seasonal vegetables any time!

Rant over.

(Posted by Asclepius - Last bodpodded at 10.3% BF and who eats when hungry and until full and never does 'cardio')